Actually, although I'm not an expert on ancient papyrii, I believe that the text will be found to read not "Jesus said to them ""My wife....""; but rather, "Jesus said the them, ""My lesbian wife...."
And I was told this by the Archbishop of Canterbury. I swear.
Daniel Ratericus narrat: Falsum sed accuratum.
“Ancient” as in “early Medieval” (600-900 A.D.), but “early Medieval” doesn’t have the cachet that “ancient” does. At any rate, it’s a very late document of extremely dubious pedigree.
I don’t have a problem with Jesus having a wife. The custom was to marry so perhaps he did.
These "historians" believe in man-made global warming BS and sell snake oil calling it "education". Trust them not!
All this demonstrates, if true, is that it was written many centuries ago. I just finished reading an anthology titled, The Lost Bible. It is amazing just how many books were written in the early years of Christianity that were full of nonsense about Jesus and his disciples.
Gnostic Blasphemy....But then again, those two words are redundant.
She must’ been otherwise engaged the day they nailed Him to a tree...
it only confirms that such a document may have existed, and someone” possibly between A.D. 3XX and A.D. 7XX likely produced it
that does not identify who they were or who they might have been or what their beliefs or motivations were
and there were many different “Jesus gospels” written by many different people (all original authors of them unknown) over the centuries
what does the “scientific analysis” about the scrap of parchment CONFIRM, religiously? next to nothing