Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: barefoot_hiker
That's probably all you can get; the canali reported by Schiaparelli are still reported today, and in the same places, which is weird, because I don't think there's any sign of them from probes. He was able to make out the large impact features, but the term canali led Percival Lowell and a few others to believe that there were artificial water channels on Mars. One of the non-explanations for them was that anyone seeing a blurry orange dot would automatically just make up details like that, another nail in the coffin of the idea that "skeptics" are rational.
8 posted on 04/10/2014 6:37:10 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Dust storms blowing across the planet - like our cold fronts, they’d create a blurry impression of lines.

And, the next time, wouldn’t a blurry-eyed astronomer “want” to see the same impression of lines again? Even his sketches didn’t have the same lines in the same latitudes again.


9 posted on 04/10/2014 6:52:18 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

At High magnification I have seen the lines. The eyes do play tricks.

But, the weather has been so bad here the last few months, I have yet to see Mars through a scope.

Hoping for a chance this weekend.


10 posted on 04/10/2014 7:11:16 AM PDT by Conan the Librarian (The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson