To: barefoot_hiker
That's probably all you can get; the
canali reported by
Schiaparelli are still reported today, and in the same places, which is weird, because I don't think there's any sign of them from probes. He was able to make out the large impact features, but the term
canali led
Percival Lowell and a few others to believe that there were artificial water channels on Mars. One of the non-explanations for them was that anyone seeing a blurry orange dot would automatically just make up details like that, another nail in the coffin of the idea that "skeptics" are rational.
8 posted on
04/10/2014 6:37:10 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
Dust storms blowing across the planet - like our cold fronts, they’d create a blurry impression of lines.
And, the next time, wouldn’t a blurry-eyed astronomer “want” to see the same impression of lines again? Even his sketches didn’t have the same lines in the same latitudes again.
9 posted on
04/10/2014 6:52:18 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: SunkenCiv
At High magnification I have seen the lines. The eyes do play tricks.
But, the weather has been so bad here the last few months, I have yet to see Mars through a scope.
Hoping for a chance this weekend.
10 posted on
04/10/2014 7:11:16 AM PDT by
Conan the Librarian
(The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson