[holden]

So many of your posts have the same, tired pattern of asking a question that it's clearly not BDZ or anyone else's responsibility to answer. You should simply stop. Furthermore, it's clear from your writing that your repeated intent is to try to smear her character, research and intellect. Although she might not be perfect, she's proved herself again and again around here that she bring a lot of good and usefulness to the table, not least of which is her moral, well-intentioned, conservative approach to things.

She's no more beholden to you than you are to yourself about other ways Fuddy could have been killed. Your calling attention to other manner of mayhem for which there is little or no evidence serves only to confuse the issues, but that, too, is apparently your intent.

Your aforementioned behavior characteristics don't mesh with conservatives, for whom this website was intended. So I suggest you find a place more to your way of thinking and behaving. DU, perhaps.

HF

[little jeremiah]

Cousteau claimed he’s a neighbor of a member here who asked him to bring his expertise to another thread on the same topic.

Needless to say, he’s obviously using a second screen name here or perhaps a retread. IMHO of course.

[Lurking Libertarian]

So many of your posts have the same, tired pattern of asking a question that it's clearly not BDZ or anyone else's responsibility to answer. You should simply stop. Furthermore, it's clear from your writing that your repeated intent is to try to smear her character, research and intellect.

Butterdezillion has said many times that she puts her theories out for FReepers to comment on and to find flaws with them if there are any. Cousteau's comments do precisely that, IMHO.

Your aforementioned behavior characteristics don't mesh with conservatives, for whom this website was intended. So I suggest you find a place more to your way of thinking and behaving. DU, perhaps.

Who died and put you in charge of Free Republic? JimRob knows how to zot people who need zotting.

[cousteausghost]

So when someone posts a completely ludicrous theory and when you encourange them to think through the logical consequences of what they are saying (ie when did all these hundreds of people give their consent to take part in this exercise) - that’s a bad thing? Ok then - got it, you want FR to be for cranks. Carry on - as you were.