Where I have been is insisting that you can’t base an entire, wild, creepily bizarre theory on the fact of your positive ID of an old black and white photo of a small boy, identified by the poster of the photo as David Ndesandjo. You claim you can eyeball the photo and positively ID Barack Hussein Obama II. If your powers of observation were so keen, you’d have never eyeballed this nudie model and positively IDed Stanley Ann Obama. But you did. So your Mal-Val theory is kaput.
100% desperate nonsense.