Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah; Fred Nerks

I wasn’t/am not the one claiming there are or were nude pics of SAD. I quoted for you a Fred Nerks post in which he, not I, made that claim. Clear?


489 posted on 04/05/2014 10:24:26 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter; Fred Nerks
And for the FReepers who scoff, let me ask this; who would have believed it if any one had predicted that we would discover nude photographs of Stanley Ann Dunham?

Sure sounds as though you are speaking for yourself there, not quoting anyeone.

I wasn’t/am not the one claiming there are or were nude pics of SAD. I quoted for you a Fred Nerks post in which he, not I, made that claim. Clear?

You and others here were obsessively promoting the Gilbert mockumentary as fact for a long time and I never saw any retractions. I also never read FN make the claim that the photos were SAD, in fact FN posted over and over again proof that they were not. If FN initially thought they were, it was subsequently debunked by FN very clearly, and many times. You and a few others were on the "The nude photos are SAD" bandwagon for a long time. I have never seen you or the other supporters of the mockumentary admit you were wrong.

490 posted on 04/05/2014 10:30:32 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies ]

To: Fantasywriter
I wasn’t/am not the one claiming there are or were nude pics of SAD. I quoted for you a Fred Nerks post in which he, not I, made that claim. Clear?

After which I traced the image to a porn site that devoted several pages to images of girls wearing stockings, high heeled shoes and large earrings. The images published by someone claiming they were of Stanley Ann, one with a serial number, had been removed, but there were a number of others of the same girl.

I finally traced the original poster. It turned out to be a Brisbane 'academic' who claimed they had been sent to him by an anonymous 'genealogist' - and when I sent him further examples of the same girl, other than those he had linked to a page off-site from his blog, from which the images we are familiar with were circulated, he stopped responding to my correspondence. I didn't name him, and hoped he would be ashamed.

We then looked deeper into the comparisons between the two women, Stanley Ann and the model, and ultimately found that not only was there little resemblance, but Stanley Ann would have needed major facial restructuring to remotely resemble the model from the exotic website. Finally, a collection of the magazines in which the images appeared came to light which showed that the photographs had been published in 1958.

The site, vintage-pron com was totally wiped clean at the time of the Gilbert mockumentary. I posted literally hundreds of examples to show it was NOT the same person. And now you choose a comment I made in 2008 before all this work? Where have you been for the last five or six years?

Writing fantasy?

512 posted on 04/05/2014 2:37:59 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson