I decided to see it after a cute lady asked. So, I put all accounts aside and saw it as a movie on its own.
It’s kind of hokey, like a star trek-ish disaster movie where the script writers kept looking for emotional angles to support the boring plot.
Seriously, how can anybody do an interesting story about a boat and a flood? You can’t do a remake of Gilligan’s Island, there’s no island. All you can do is develop some excuse for the building of a giant ark by a crew of rock creatures, let the rains fall and then say “Boy, glad that’s over; the end!”
The writers got in a few cheap shots at biblical verses, such as man having dominion over all the animals as the villain eats a lizard. The writers should have put him in as slaughtering a Unicorn instead.
I see a sequel coming up. The rock creatures build the pyramids in Egypt and prove the jews should not be in Israel.
RE: The writers should have put him in as slaughtering a Unicorn instead.
I don’t mind spoilers, so, is it true that Unicorns were in the ark in the movie?