To: AlexW
What am I missing here? An actual lesson in history...with some license.
Ragnar Lothbrock/Lodbrock was an actual person from Viking history. Ragnar may be an amalgamation of several persons from history. There is not enough to pin it down. Though his exploits are not extremely well documented those of his sons are. It is a very good look back into the past around 750 AD.
Fancy that. The History Channel actually showing history for a change.
88 posted on
03/29/2014 11:52:40 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Truth sounds like hate...to those who hate truth.)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
As long as it isn’t live, it is history!
94 posted on
03/29/2014 12:47:28 PM PDT by
US_MilitaryRules
(Tastes like Heaven, Burns like Hell! Mmmmmm. What is it?)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Ragnar Lothbrock/Lodbrock was an actual person from Viking history. Ragnar may be an amalgamation of several persons from history. There is not enough to pin it down. Though his exploits are not extremely well documented those of his sons are. It is a very good look back into the past around 750 AD.Whenever I saw Rollo whining I wanted to yell at my TV: "Quit bellyaching, Rollo! You're going to end up with all of Northwest France and start a dynasty that will ultimately rule England. Get your act together and stop complaining about not getting R.E.S.P.E.C.T."
97 posted on
03/29/2014 2:43:40 PM PDT by
PJ-Comix
(ObamaCare unsubsidized PAID Enrollment Prediction: 66,666)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson