Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lmo56

It’s their second NCAA Tournament victory ever. Lat year they had their first. Pretty amazing they’ve had so few considering they’ve been around so long.


3 posted on 03/20/2014 1:32:28 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: be-baw

Not too amazing. There was no way they could compete for the best players. Sports have a very different meaning than they appear to have at other colleges.


12 posted on 03/20/2014 1:47:27 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: be-baw
It’s their second NCAA Tournament victory ever. Lat year they had their first. Pretty amazing they’ve had so few considering they’ve been around so long.

Not so strange. The NCAA Tournament didn't start until until 1939, long after Harvard and Yale won so many football championships and had become irrelevant in major sports. Even then, only eight teams were in the tournament.

March Madness didn't jump to 32 games until 1975. Penn or Princeton has won the Ivy almost every year since then (yes, Cornell, you won about three).

Harvard's won three of the last four Ivies (and lost the fourth in a one-game playoff).

25 posted on 03/20/2014 3:50:55 PM PDT by Scoutmaster (Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: be-baw

Another factor not listed above: Ivies don’t give athletic scholarships. Yes, their athletes are treated rather well and an applicant’s athletic ability might tip the scale in their favor on admissions, but no one is admitted with an athletic scholarship. At $50K/year that becomes significant.


30 posted on 03/20/2014 4:57:59 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson