To: GrandJediMasterYoda
I could be wrong, but I think this may be the test run of a new tactic. Release several (phony) negative stories about Hillary, only to have them discredited. By the time the truthful stuff (i.e. Benghazi) comes out, it will be ignored.
To: Right Brother
I could be wrong, but I think this may be the test run of a new tactic. Release several (phony) negative stories about Hillary, only to have them discredited. This particular story, however, is the truth.
9 posted on
03/16/2014 10:29:25 PM PDT by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Right Brother
This is a long practiced tactic and it is called "inoculation" and the key is timing.
To see its use now is expected. Between now and Nov 2016, the response will be "That was covered years ago, nothing there, ... let's come on can't we."
It is a variant of "What difference does it make now?" This is also known as NOT holding (certain) people accountable.
18 posted on
03/17/2014 1:23:16 AM PDT by
jamaksin
To: Right Brother
I remember this from a while back. If I recall correctly, it’s true.
20 posted on
03/17/2014 1:27:24 AM PDT by
Bullish
(America should yank Obama like a rotten tooth before he poisons the entire body)
To: Right Brother
That and other similar stories sure do sound KLINTOONish don’t they?
31 posted on
03/17/2014 9:09:16 AM PDT by
X-spurt
(CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson