Two things about this comment.
Piss off? Isn't this a criminal matter and you're only piss off a few pols?
As long as it breaks by summer and impacts the midterms? You mean the universe shattering news might not have an impact?
PS: Why are they doing a video to document criminal charges?
“Piss off? Isn’t this a criminal matter and you’re only piss off a few pols?
“As long as it breaks by summer and impacts the midterms? You mean the universe shattering news might not have an impact?
“PS: Why are they doing a video to document criminal charges?”
You saw how the Obot MSM reporters attacked Arpaio at the early 2012 presser. Arpaio is aging and knows his limitations. Having an excellent professional presentation of the evidence point by point prepared by Gillar allows citizens to see a quality expose of the details without having to be framed and filtered by the MSM Obots.
As you point out, presenting a Gillar video in association with a criminal indictment is different and would be secondary to the presentation of the indictment by a prosecuting authority. The prosecutor would NOT be using Gillar’s video to announce the indictment.
So which prosecutor will it be? Maricopa County? Arizona State? A US Attorney covering Some part of AZ or DC it the corruption emanated from there? That remains to be seen.