It's actually.....crystal clear.
but certainly doesn’t seem to be the open-and-shut case as many think it is. If a U.S. soldier marries overseas and has a child, that child should be a natural-born citizen at birth.
Why? Just because the father's a soldier?
Not good enough for Constitutional requirements!
What is a natural-born citizen according to you and why would a child born overseas to American parent not be considered a natural-born citizen? According to you, that child would have to go through a process to become a U.S. citizen. I don't believe that child would have to go through any process because he has at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen. The debate is not about WHERE he was born. The debate is whether one or both parents must be a U.S. citizen.