What confuses you is when somebody actually reads the article and follows the facts and the evidence found therein — as opposed to some people who come to these threads with preconceived notions and a wornout agenda.
You should try the former some time.
I don’t take advice from Internet schizophrenics - but thanks for playing.
You speak of facts and evidence, what about the witness who obtained the video stating this was bad conduct on the officers part?
What about witness statement evidence?
Does that not fit your agenda?