Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop

You are assuming that communication [successful transmission of information] between entangled particles [e.g., photons] is what facilitates the matching of their respective states of spin.
***That seems also to have been Einstein’s assumption, as well as others. The issue does not seem to be resolved in physics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_realism#Local_realism


212 posted on 02/25/2014 5:56:37 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo; Alamo-Girl; TXnMA; Heartlander
The issue does not seem to be resolved in physics.

Well not yet at least, dear Kevmo! Here's a closely relevant problem that needs to be addressed IMHO:

Local Realism
Local realism is the combination of the principle of locality with the "realistic" assumption that all objects must objectively have a pre-existing value for any possible measurement before the measurement is made.

Local realism is Newton's main assumption, and Einstein's main assumption. It only gets you so far — conveniently within four-dimensional reality....

Somehow I sense we are on the verge of a paradigm shift....

Thanks for the link, and for writing, dear Kevmo!

213 posted on 02/25/2014 7:05:51 PM PST by betty boop (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. —Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson