Lt. Zullo remarks in the one hour video- as to the BC forgery proffered by the white hut as being a felony act x two, if my memory serves me correctly.
My guess is they are going after the forgers.
Maybe Sheriff Arpaio and company are focusing on a false document being presented to an elected Arizona official (Secretary of State) for the purpose of election qualification?
This would be within the legal jurisdiction of AZ., and Maricopa County. Perhaps, a grand jury has been presented with the facts, and has issued an indictment of the document forgers? Whether that document is the BC, or election instrument, or something else... I do not know? Maybe it’s something else entirely?
Maybe, the CCP has received a tip or multiple tips, or an artifact or other piece of evidence has been submitted by an interested outside source? Maybe someone from an alphabet agency within the government made an independent decision to act; emboldened by Sheriff Arpaio’s tenacity?
Maybe, the CCP themselves uncovered something significant in their investigation that is solid enough to merit criminal charges?
Maybe, the evidence is strong enough to compel the AZ. Attorney General to act?
I think Sheriff Arpaio, Zullo, and the CCP learned a valuable lesson in the previous public unveiling of what they had uncovered regarding Soebarkah, and the utter failure to garner enough traction to recruit members of congress, the media, or the public at large (to act in concert) with regards to the usurpation of our laws and in bringing the responsible criminal elements to justice. The silver lining being a harsh learning curve, a bad taste in everyone’s mouth, and a redoubling of their efforts.
“Lt. Zullo remarks in the one hour video- as to the BC forgery proffered by the white hut as being a felony act x two, if my memory serves me correctly.”
I have been trying to parse Gallups’ and Zullo’s comments about a “second criminal investigation.”
Is it a second investigation that, unlike the first, is criminal, or is it a second criminal investigation in addition to a first criminal investigation?
In context I believe that there are two investigations, but only one is being considered “criminal” by Gallups and Zullo:
1. the “non-criminal” CCP investigation into the BC forgery
2. the criminal MCSO investigation using two deputies
Yes, it is maddening that the CCP BC investigation is “non-criminal” but criminal jurisdiction has been denied, so far, by the Maricopa County DA, IIRC.