[tacticalogic]

That may or may not be true and may be as much evidence of incremental design as some other kind of process. What it DOESN'T prove is transference which is essential to evolution as the explanation for the origin of all living things.

Nobody claimed it as proof.

[PapaNew]

Well then you’re going to need more evidence that is clear and convincing or at a least a preponderance against the ID evidence to have a valid argument. Otherwise you don’t know if your stand is based on an illusion or if is refuted by a stronger argument (that of ID).