I leave opinions that are outside my areas of expertise to the experts. I would never pretend to possess expertise in line spacing, OCR, Adobe Illustrator PDF optimization, kerning, Mixed Raster Content or the like.
As you are well aware, my primary interest has always been in the judicial process regarding Article II, Section One eligibility.
If there are indeed “unexplained anomalies,” let expert witnesses explain them to a grand jury, to a judge/jury or to a congressional committee.
Of course. I understand completely. The idea that a typewriter is constrained to print characters in specific positions is far too complex for your untrained mind to grasp.
Why, the concept is just mind-boggling! One must be a veritable Sherlock Holmes to comprehend this evidence! And all this time we thought you were *SO* intelligent because of the ready way you've always rode to Obama's defense with a garbage truck full of legal dreck.
Obviously opining on law requires far less knowledge and intelligence than does comprehending the characteristics of a typewriter. I expect this is certainly true in your case anyway.
More like you have the wit to realize that you can't spin this to your favor and so you just want this cup to pass before you.
Well, Honesty isn't very useful for either Lawyers or Obama apologists.