“What purpose would closing her cases serve?”
IIRC, Orly is trying to compel disclosure of Reed Hayes report which was submitted in AL but is under seal. The Hayes report is also copyrighted by Zullo who personally paid for it (again, IIRC).
Zullo and Arpaio and Hayes don’t need to be wasting legal fees for court filings and appearances to prevent premature disclosure of the Hayes report when it appears, as Gallups contends, that the new “universe-shattering evidence” will render the Hayes report essentially moot.
Finding an alternate BC for Barry that can be proved-up in federal court under federal rules of evidence would make the Hayes report far less important.
Orly also has been pursuing dead-end criminal accusation against Barry in CIVIL court where no judge can impose any remedy against Barry. Only the Congress can impeach and convict Barry. That is where Arpaio’s evidence must go, not to one of Orly’s state or federal court cases IMO.
Whatever the new evidence against Barry is, it must overcome the “full faith and credit” that all federal courts must extend to the state of HI under the Constitution.
Gallup - I don’t know what you’re talking about. I have not written a letter. Neither Mike nor I have asked her to stand down. I don’t know where it came from…It is an absolute fabrication. I have never nor would I ever write such a letter.
Exposed: Orly Taitz Sent Stand-Down Letter; An Absolute Fabrication; Obot Tricks
"I don’t know what you’re talking about. I have not written a letter. Neither Mike nor I have asked her to stand down. I don’t know where it came from…It is an absolute fabrication. I have never nor would I ever write such a letter."