Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: skeeter
So they aren’t ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ until they are caught.

That's not what I said.

26 posted on 02/01/2014 9:02:04 AM PST by Scoutmaster (I'd rather be at Philmont)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster

Its what I said. It defies common sense to claim a person is subject to a jurisdiction if there is no record of their presence.


28 posted on 02/01/2014 9:04:14 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson