“Lookie here, numbnuts. I pointed you to A 150 EXPERIMENTS that were looked at by the EXPERTs in MEASUREMENT error and they said there was NO measurement error, there’s a verified anomaly. Is this just another way for you to pull some satire and claim it to be real? Or are you just plain looney-toons? I’ll go for the latter.”
You pointed me to a ‘demo’ and I quoted you the statement of the demonstrator.
NO Net Integrated energy calculation because of lack of calibration! NO CALC ... NO NET HEAT DEMONSTRATED. Try again.
Okay then. Time for me to play PTSIFOM. I looked through the file and did not find what you claim is there. So produce it. In the absence of that proof and in the presence of 150 reviewed replications by National Instruments, I’m sticking with you being just plain looney toons.
I quoted you the statement of the demonstrator.
***You quoted a statement of someone else COMPLETELY UNRELATED to Scientific Instruments’s presentation that I posted.