Straw argument. I never said that.
My position is that the funding of the research should be proportional to results. Right now the results of Cold Fusion are 14 ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE more cost effective than CHF.
—————————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg85822.html-———————
And my position is also that the level of invective should be proportional to the fraud involved. With CHF we’ve got hundreds of $billions pissed down a fraud rathole, a 50 year corner-turn, and nothing to show for it. with Cold Fusion we’ve got a 3 year corner-turn, only a few tens of $millions spent, and IP being bought on the open market. So if you combine the two calculations, you’ve got another 2 orders of magnitude added to the 14 where Cold Fusion is more cost effective, it is now 16 Orders Of Magnitude less fraudulent. So you should be spending way, way (16 ‘way’) more energy and effort decrying the CHF fraud.
“Right now the results of Cold Fusion are 14 ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE more cost effective than CHF.”
Effective for supporting Rossi and buddies at taxpayer expense ...
“And my position is also that the level of invective should be proportional to the fraud involved.”
So, you want me to go away and leave you to your scamming?
“with Cold Fusion we’ve got a 3 year corner-turn, only a few tens of $millions spent, and IP being bought on the open market. “
Show where tens of millions have been spent on cold fusion ....
Duh.... three years ago Rossi was one year from production ...
“IP being bought on the open market”
Web address?