The mere mention of “God” does not mean the supernatural God of creation. For example, Albert Einstein’s “god” was Spinoza’s pantheist conception of deity (divinized matter) evolving within nature. For paganized physicists, “god” is something remarkably similar to Brahmanism’s Void-—an energy field from which particles emanate similar to how waves move across the ocean. Teilhard’s “Christ” is divinized matter he calls Omega. Marx’s dialectical matter is self-powered, self-perfecting ‘thinking’ matter.
All pagan systems are anti-human as there is no source for life, being, personhood. The concept of personhood arises -—only-—from the Christian God who is One God in three Persons.
To exclude creation as Heartlander did is to exclude the One God in three Persons. If man is not the image-bearer of the God of creation ex nihilo then he is less than nothing.
Jeepers, spirited — then why on earth does Einstein call this "divinized matter" "the Old Man?" Doesn't sound very pantheist to me.