Hmmm
Yes, I could see how someone with limited intelligence might think this as they would be unfamiliar with data verification, the peer-review process, and other tools in science. I could also see how an irrational dogmatic alarmist might state this as to scare people into thinking science would be taken over by some type of theocracy. Either way, I dont have the time to educate the first case or the desire to debate the second. But for those with the ability to learn and who are open-minded (meaning Betty) - here is a brief synopsis
I can see how a zealot would sidestep discussion of unintended consequences by deriding anyone who might consider them.
Who’s going to peer review Genesis?
Oh my!!! Thus these "yelpers" methodological materialists, a/k/a/ "MMs" just keep on "yelping!" Their logical position is self-contradictory and thus perilous; but they just don't seem to care or want to notice.
Good grief, I just loved "the publicity condition" the yelpers would impose on us NOT!!!
I'm sorry, but I just suspect that people who think the way the MMs do are totally out of their minds. They are psychiatric patients or ought to be.
Plus their behavior kind of reminds me of a turkey house: initial conditions are quiet; but then, one turkey starts yelling and sets off the entire turkey community within earshot to do likewise, as if in total panic.
Result: NOISE. Nothing means anything in this scenario. It is just turkeys "communicating" with each other....
Better stop for now. Thank you ever so much for writing, dear Heartlander!