[driftdiver]

Well obviously she represented a significant threat to the officer as she drove away.

[onedoug]

And a significant threat to anyone else she may have encountered.

[cuban leaf]

Well obviously she represented a significant threat to the officer as she drove away.

---

I don’t think he should have done what he did, but she showed the kind of poor decision making skills that could have gotten other people hurt sometime in the future.

I know a guy who’s 48 year old sister has been in prison three times for battery. We’re talking seriously dangerous woman. She sliced most of the scalp of a woman off her head (required over 50 stitches) in a “bar fight” and “****ed up” a couple of males on the other occasions. But she kept getting out after only two of ten years each time. She’s out now and I steer clear of this woman, especially when I’m not armed.

Why mention all the drama? Sometimes a person is just dangerous. And doing what this woman did with her car (assuming that is what happened) makes her potentially dangerous in the future. For all we know that officer may have saved the lives of others in the future. She should have stopped and stayed stopped. It’s on her.

[dsc]

Don’t police officers have guns in part to shoot people who run?

[oldenuff2no]

"Well obviously she represented a significant threat to the officer as she drove away."

Well obviously she represented a significant threat to each and every man woman and child living in those residential neighborhoods as she recklessly raced through at up to 89 MPH.

If the LEO had let the chase continue and she had hit a single mom with two kids in the car and killed them all you would be the first one yelling that it was the cops fault because he didn't stop her when he had the chance to.