Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Straight Vermonter

This is what burns me up. At least the NFL has an objective method of seeding teams. We will soon discover how big of a joke these playoffs are.

It will be Notre Dame (which is not part of conference) plus three teams each year.


8 posted on 01/08/2014 7:17:24 PM PST by Perdogg (Ted Cruz-Rand Paul 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Perdogg
It will be Notre Dame (which is not part of conference) plus three teams each year.

I have the same concern. That is why the BCS system with a 4 team playoff would be better than either the existing system or the new system.

10 posted on 01/08/2014 7:23:46 PM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
Even the old BCS system was *somewhat* objective, as a third of each team's rankings came from computer rankings (say what you will about that).

But the new playoff system rankings are entirely subjective, based solely on human whims.

This could get ugly.

12 posted on 01/08/2014 7:25:09 PM PST by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

“At least the NFL has an objective method of seeding teams.”

Objective? Is that why an 11 - 5 team has to play an away game against a team that went 9 - 7?

In the NFL conferences should be realigned every year, top to bottom. That would be ‘objective’. ;-)


14 posted on 01/08/2014 7:33:42 PM PST by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (What we need is to sucker the fedthugs into a "Tiananmen Square"-like incident on the National Mall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
"This is what burns me up. At least the NFL has an objective method of seeding teams. We will soon discover how big of a joke these playoffs are."

' The "objective" NFL format would seed a 15-1 team that finished second in its division lower than an 8-8 team that won it's division. What is your formula for an "objective" NCAA Division 1 format that includes about a dozen conferences and about 120 teams? With - say - two 12-0 teams and three 11-1 teams and 7 10-2 teams and 10 9-3 teams, what is your "objective method for determining who gets in the playoffs?
23 posted on 01/08/2014 10:04:38 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
It will be Notre Dame (which is not part of conference) plus three teams each year.

I'm not sure how much you watch college football, but Notre Dame has lost at least 3 games a year in 19 out of the last 20 seasons.

Their odds of getting into the playoff are actually pretty slim, especially when so many of the decision makers have conference affiliations, and are giving credit to conference winners.

The major issue is how the money will be divvied, and whether or not (or how often) the SEC gets two teams into the playoff, and thereby a much bigger chunk of the spoils. Make no mistake, the playoff is about getting more of the money to the top5 conferences.

27 posted on 01/08/2014 10:34:43 PM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson