[Partisan Gunslinger]

I don't think so.

So they were absolutely correct when they said this most recent recession was over a couple of years ago? lol

I agree. They also delayed the announcement of the 1991 recovery, to help Bush's opponent. Don't see how that helps your case though.

Um...you use data from a source that shows its bias toward the Wilsons, FDRs, and Obamas of the world. Naturally they're going to want to fudge their numbers in favor of these guys, and their policies, the Federal Reserve being a big part of Wilson's and FDR's policies.

The people that brought in the Federal Reserve also bought in the League of Nations and the UN. Read up on what Warburg did after Jekyll Island, and you don't think there's a conflict of interest here?

Show me a chart that shows this "long depression" you speak of, all I see is gain from 1873 to 1896.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Um...you use data from a source that shows its bias toward the Wilsons, FDRs, and Obamas of the world. Naturally they're going to want to fudge their numbers in favor of these guys, and their policies, the Federal Reserve being a big part of Wilson's and FDR's policies.

So they faked the data from the 1800s, to help Wilson and FDR? LOL!

You're funny.