Your “logical” deduction shows that you understand none of the following:
Reasoning
Evolution
Faith
God
Science
Creation
Morality
Thus, it is not surprising that your conclusion (if evolution applies to man, then morality does not) is pure, unadulterated crap.
________________________________________________________
The logic is sound.
There is a difference between “Objective Morality” and “Subjective Morality”
The statement assumes “Objective Morality”
Evolutionists love to suggest some “evolved social morality” but they cannot escape their own logic.
According to the evolutionist’s logic, “Objective Morality” is not a necessity, and does not exist.
They fail into a rat hole of relativism.
“Objective morality” is an oxymoron.
The logic is less than sound.
Can you tell me what asserted but entirely unproven assumption lies at the center of this logic expression you are defending?