[Kartographer]

The first thing I can tell you the amount of anger toward skeptics of and the pathological devotion by the proponents of any scientific theroy especially one that hads yet to have any true success in being proven is in itself a big red flag of caution to me.

[Kevmo]

pathological devotion by the proponents of any scientific theroy
***And exactly what theory is that? Do you even know the difference between theory and observation of facts? The fact that you don’t know “ is in itself a big red flag of caution to me.” WW is correct in identifying your skepticism as pathological.

asked & answered
-———————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg87491.html-———————

[Wonder Warthog]

"The first thing I can tell you the amount of anger toward skeptics of and the pathological devotion by the proponents of any scientific theroy especially one that hads yet to have any true success in being proven is in itself a big red flag of caution to me.

There is no scientific theory of LENR. My support of LENR is totally based on experimental evidence, not theory. And in the world of science, experiment trumps theory.

Your statement "yet to have any true success" is simply wrong. "True success" in the world of science comes from replicated experiments....which have been done, and the results are available.

But I'll ask again......what scientific evidence have you studied on the subject?