You have no more information then me. My skeptical ignorance is your ignorant acceptance.
I have way more information than you. I have actually read many of the papers at lenr-canr.org and elsewhere. That does not qualify as ignorance, so your claim that I have “ignorant acceptance” is smoked.
You acknowledge your own skeptical ignorance. You just admitted to being ignorant and skeptical at the same time. Somehow this is a virtue? You’ve shown over just a few posts that you’re utterly incapable of inductive reasoning. Every point you have attempted has been quickly and easily refuted.