No, factual but long for the thick-headed.
What did I post that was “silly” or false?
Nothing.
Which is why you won’t refute it. Because you can’t.
Man up, or can’t you do that either?
What did you post that was silly? You posted a long disjointed rant relying on Senator “Scottish Law” Specter’s utterly irrelevant assessment of whether some part of the process would stand up in court. Silliness on stilts. You’ve been around long enough that you should be bowled over laughing at that silliness.
False? As you later conceded, Goodel’s was the Commissioner, not Taglibue...which is an important point as to motive for the harsh punishment, as Goodel had just taken over and this was his first major discipline case. It seems likely that Goodel wasn’t about to have this turned around on him just because VP Football ops Ray Anderson had botched his clarification memo.
You also said that the Patriots were punished for filming a Super Bowl walk through, which they were not.
First, the punishment was designated months before the resolution of the walk through issue, and was not altered with that resolution.
Second, no one claims to have made such a tape; no one claims to have seen such a tape; no one claims to have seen such a tape being made; and no one can even identify a source for the rumor.
That’s a fair start.