Replies

I can only show you what happened if you are willing to spend some time thinking and verifying what should make perfect sense IF you can grasp that you have been lied to. All of your questions about what happened can be answered if you start at the end. When that makes sense, you can fill in the other pieces of the puzzle. Be patient and you can be one of the few people who know what happened when JFK was shot.

Texas Governor John Connally sat almost directly in front of JFK. He made a dramatic reaction 4.8 seconds BEFORE JFK was shot in the head. That is the point the US government (and press) contend he was shot in the back. Consider the possibility that Connally was NOT shot in the back but received another wound at that point.

If you look at frame 266 from the Zapruder film which is a few seconds AFTER his first reaction to a shot, you see Governor Connally turned to look over his right shoulder several seconds AFTER the gov't says he was shot in the back. That hardly looks like a man who was shot in the back seconds earlier.

At frame 313, JFK was shot in the head, no one disputes that.

A split second after JFK was shot in the head, Connally makes another very rapid movement. Frame 324 is right before frame 327 which is right AFTER Connally is bent over.

Frame 324 and 327 are just (327 - 324)/ 18.3 frames per second or about 1/6th of a second apart How did Connally's head move so quickly? If he was shot in the back about 5.5 seconds earlier, how did his head snap downward so rapidly? The OBVIOUS answer is that Connally was shot in the back a split seconds after JFK was shot in the head.

From what we have seen, it looks like there was a shot fired at frame 224. That is (313 - 224)/ 18.3 frames per second. That means a shot looks like it was fired 4.8 seconds BEFORE JFK was shot in the head.

Connally's head moves rapidly (325 - 313)/18.3 frames per second or 0.7 seconds AFTER JFK is shot in the head.

SUMMARY: IT can be argued that the last three shots look like they were fired 4.8 seconds and 0.7 seconds apart when looking at the Zapruder film.

Consider the second way that can be used to determine the timing of the shots. This is a screen capture from a TV "documentary", I changed nothing.

You obviously notice that the last three shots are separated 4.8 seconds and 0.7 seconds apart!

If you understand this to this point, you know sevearal things:

1. The US Gubermint lied to hide the truth, they couldn't have been so incompetent to miss that the last two shots were fired BANG-BANG. I can show you MANY witnesses that said that is what they heard BUT the US Gubermint said those were echoes, not separate shots. The first (of the last two shots) was fired from the right front. It drove JFK's head directly away from the gunman on the grassy knoll. The last shot fired from behind (TSBD shot #3) missed JFK's head and hit Connally in the back, driving him forward directly away from the gunman.

2. The audio analysis correlation allows not only the timing of the shots to be identified, it allows a method to determine the location of each of the shots that were fired. The HSCA audio experts made mistakes but they were not allowed to do more testing. If they would have, you would have known decades ago who the conspirators were in the US government.

3. Vince Bugliosi's book RECLAIMING HISTORY contains a large amount of useful information as he is an excellent researcher. Unfortunately for him, his technical skills reveal he had no idea what he was looking at. Bugliosi calls the audio evidence "a bill of goods" when in fact using it and the Zapruder film together allows the JFK assassination to be solved.

4. Once you know what actually happened during the shooting and compare it to the gubermint's lone shooter lies, it leads to a couple of big names in the US gubermint. Yes, you can know who was behind the JFK assassination.

5. The US gubermint discovered a half century ago how easy it was to lie to Americans. Fool the presstitutes and you fool America. You cannot understand US history since the JFK assassination unless you understand how they lied to hide the truth. When Hussein Obama lied about Benghazi, he knew how easeily it is to fool the presstitutes. As long as the presstitutes are confused, America flounders.

Of course this does NOT pass the smell test because if what I showed you is correct, then there are over a thousand books on the JFK assassination that are WRONG. If you followed the story this far, you get to decide if you can still reason and think without the gubermint and the lapdog presstitutes telling you the answers.

If you watch this video, it may make more sense.

One of the BIGGEST lies in the JFK assassination

Didn't mean to ignore your hard work. I've been tired and my mind can only deal with so much. At my own pace and not looking for anything in particular other than the dates Jackie was born and died, I've picked up some bits and pieces. As I've done since it happened. I knew there were missing pieces, lied to as you put it. But when you don't have a good counter argument, best to leave it be.

Why would Oswald be carrying a pistol later that day and use it on Officer Tippet unless that is a lie, too?

BTW I saw a video of Osward's and Marina's daughter, June and also a very short clip of Marina when she was younger.

So I'm not good at ballistics. The shot that blew his head apart looks like it came from ground level. The earlier shots, I can't tell if they came from high up or not.

Now I believe LHO was one of the shooters. They were living apart at the time, why isn't given, he brought his gun and put it in the garage. The next morning it was gone. A gun (rifle) was left on the floor with three spent shells so they say. It occurred to me how was the window? Was it one that could be opened and shut again?

So who were the other shooter(s)? I read GHWB was in Dallas that day. JFK had it for the CIA. Jack Ruby was involved with the mob (as was RFK coming down on them). So that could be a motive. Obviously they would have hired somebody.

Totally cold blooded heartless killing and no regard for Jackie or anyone else in the motorcade.

Here are all the people or groups that were upset with JFK.

The CIA and by extension maybe the FBI. LBJ. Castro. The Russians. The mob. Something with France, not sure what, doubt it was them. Israel, Ben Gurion was mad because JFK didn't want them to get nukes at Dimona.

I'm not sure who dunnit. I don't see how they could have pulled it off from the grassy knoll without being seen.

The answer to my question why Jackie kept on the bloody clothes, the NYT and others have quoted her as saying, "I want them to see what THEY did to (him, my husband, JFK)". They could lie about that, too, I suppose.