Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Q-ManRN
 
government and the police in most localities....in most states the government and police owe no legal duty to protect individual
 
"Most localities", "In most states"? Think the author missed out with that, it's federal. NO locality could absorb the legal liability if they assumed responsibility to protect individuals and their property. Decades of case law explain that in detail -
 
Riss v. City of New York, 22 N.Y.2d 579, 293 NYS2d 897, 240 N.E.2d 860 (N.Y. Ct. of Ap. 1958)
 
Keane v. City of Chicago, 98 Ill. App.2d 460, 240 N.E.2d 321 (1968)
 
Silver v. City of Minneapolis, 170 N.W.2d 206 (S.Ct. Minn. 1969)
 
Simpson's Food Fair v. Evansville, 272 N.E. 2d 871 (Ind.Ct. of Ap. 1971)
 
Sapp v. City of Tallahassee, 348 So.2d 363 (Fla.Ct. of Ap. 1977)
 
Weutrich v. Delia, 155 N.J. Super 324, 326, 382 A.2d 929, 930 (1978)
 
Chapman v. City of Philadelphia, 434 A.2d 753 (Sup.Ct. Penn. 1981)
 
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981)
 
Davidson v. City of Westminster, 32 C.3d 197, 185 Cal.Rptr. 252, 649 P.2d 894 (S.Ct. Cal. 1982)
 
Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 61 (7th Cir. 1982)
 
Morgan v. District of Columbia, 468 A.2d 1306 (D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1983)
 
Morris v. Musser, 478 A.2d 937 (1984)
 
Calogrides v. City of Mobile, 475 So.2d 560 (S.Ct. A;a. 1985)
 

23 posted on 11/17/2013 1:22:41 PM PST by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lapsus calami

Thank you for the clarification.


33 posted on 11/17/2013 2:32:40 PM PST by Q-ManRN (Progressivism is regressive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson