Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake

The judge is placing the child at risk for his own agenda.


42 posted on 11/15/2013 12:40:26 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
The judge is placing the child at risk for his own agenda.

At risk of what? Being weaned at a normal age?

My kids were eating food and drinking dairy milk at 10/11 months - nursing was not their sole form of sustenance when they were old enough to walk.

48 posted on 11/15/2013 12:47:46 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

No, the parents put the child at risk by allowing their marriage to fail.

The judge is just trying to ensure the child has access to her father.


52 posted on 11/15/2013 12:52:51 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
The judge is placing the child at risk for his own agenda.

And what's your agenda?

I'm reading your posts, and I wonder why you hate men so much!

There really are two sides to every story. You seem to be fixated on only one.

74 posted on 11/15/2013 3:20:42 PM PST by ConradofMontferrat ( According to mudslimz, my handle is a HATE CRIME. And I HOPE they don't like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson