Janine Turner: Democrats treat women as sex objects

Jill Stanek ^ | Jill Stanek

[Morgana]

The Democrats’ promise of independence for women is an empty promise.

As we approach two pivotal elections in 2014 and 2016 it’s rather vital for the survival of our democratic republic that women pay heed to the fact that not all forms of independence stem from the womb….

They hold the baby rattle over women’s heads to distract them from the true intention of the party. Dependence. This is a deception dripping in irony because women have fought for centuries for independence of mind and spirit.

The Democrats are ignoring women as a complete soul — one of intellect, courage, talent, and leadership — and focusing on the age-old tradition of treating women as sexual objects.

Haven’t we been trying to prove for centuries that we are more than our bodies? Yet this is the sole focus of the Democrats’ campaign for women — because it’s the only one they have — their reproductive organs….

Yet independence is varied and complex to the complete woman. It reaches beyond — way beyond — sex.

What good is sexual freedom if all other freedoms are sacrificed in the process?

Actress and talk radio host Janine Turner, PJMedia.com, November 7

[Heart of Georgia]

I reckon that’s a pic and you’re assuming I’m a guy?

[CodeToad]

“This is the typical liberal woman. Wants “hot” guy, and has too big an ego to realize that the only reason he’s there with her is that his hotter regular girlfriend was unavailable that night.

To her, he’s “Mr Right”.

To him, she’s “Ms Good Enough For Tonight”.”

Liberal women act like they want to be part of an 8th grade girls club to be popular. So, getting the hot guy makes them think they are popular. As you pointed out, it just means they are easy sluts and her better looking girlfriend wasn’t available. Hence, the “I hope he calls me” routine we see from these airheads.

[CodeToad]

She is also a contributing writer to PJ Media.

[PapaBear3625]

Leftists and Liberation of Women: For Lenin and the Communists liberation of women was synonymous with the concept of Community of Women which was NOT a separate village for female residents. It meant that liberated women would constitute a pool of freely available sex objects for the male Communists with no complications involved like chauvinist jealousy or marriage or possessiveness. Leftists, for all their rhetoric still look at Women’s Lib as free sex with no responsibilities for men. That is what easy abortion and contraception was always about. It was never a women’s issue. It was always a men’s issue.

More precisely, women's lib provides free and abundant sex to HIGH-STATUS men. In Communist countries, this means that the "Alpha-male" senior Party members get lots of nookie (obligation-free), the average guy gets left-overs, and the low-status schlubs get none.

The net result is that the average and low-status guys have little motivation to work hard to support the society, which will eventually collapse (taking the Alpha males and the women down with it). Meanwhile, they will get drunk and play video games to fill up their purpose-less lives.

The "patriarchy" was actually pro-women, as by ensuring that average guys got a woman who would have sex with them and bear their children, it motivated the average guy to work to provide for his family, and defend his society.

[gura]

There are people who take pride in how they communicate, and those who don’t.

[arthurus]

free and abundant sex to HIGH-STATUS males

That's what I said. Communists with a capital C are HIGH STATUS males, the ruling class. There are very few Communists in a Communist society. Entry into the elite is restricted to a few chosen.