You're right in theory, but I wouldn't take that bet and Greenfield explains why:
"The ideologues are always innocent because it's always the implementation that fails; not their ideas. It's why Communism isn't responsible for the USSR or North Korea going down the tubes. The ideas were solid, but the programmers did a bad job of coding their brilliant economic theories into a working website."
The above quote is from this highly recommended read:
Bill Clinton ran his campaigns on “triangulation” portraying himself as a moderate. He represented the people not just govt or not just business.
In 1999 the Clinton’s started a talking points campaign paving the way for Hillary’s run for president they called “the third way”.
The idea was that extremist on both the left and the right were what caused all the problems and a “New” economic policy different from the lefts of all govt all the time and the right of no govt everyone is on their own.
To get Hillary into the WH with her “New” “moderate” economics of govt and business working together, they will have to portray both sides as extremist.
The left as all govt, and the right as all business.
There is already a story out here where Hillary’s big threat isn’t from the right it is from the extreme left’s Elizabeth Warren.
The MSM is going full tilt in running Hillary’s “Third Way” campaign to portray her as a moderate and “for the people” not just for the govt or just for business.