Wrong. My statement is the educated one. I know about this.
It doesn't matter how well presented the theory is, it's nonsense. It's a rehash of a book published in 1992, which got the author and the publisher sued for libel and for which they had to apologize and pay a settlement. Beyond that, Hickey is on film during the assassination and if one bothers to examine that it's obvious he couldn't have fired the shot. As I said, it's absurd nonsense that was debunked long ago.
He was indeed sued and it was indeed settled. However, having practiced law for over 15 years a settlemant can occur and have NOTHING to do with who was right and wrong. Doctors settle malpractice suits all the time on slim or no evidence of negligence. Yes Hickey was on the film and again the bald statement that it’s nonsense simply isn’t an argument and saying that “I know this stuff” doesn’t hold water either. Again you say it was debunked but don’t actually point to anything that debunks it.
Are you an Alinsky-ite? Are you a member of Hickey’s family or perhaps associated with the Secret Service?