Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Theophilus
Imagine a star 30 times thr mass of the sun made of iron. Explode that star into an expanding sphere of iron atoms and by the time it reaches a radius of 1 light year, I bet you would not have any two iron atoms within an AU of each other.

Let's do the math. The amount of iron ejecta from a Type II supernova isn't known for certain, but one rough estimate claims it to be about half the mass of our own sun, or about 1030 kg. One light year is about 1013 km. The volume of a sphere of that size (4/3 pi r2) is about 1026 cubic kilometers. Divide that by the mass of the ejecta (1030 kg) and you get 10,000 kg of iron per cubic kilometer.

This of course assumes a uniform distribution. Actual supernovas produce complex wavefronts (see the Crab Nebula) where the local density might be might higher.

Anyway, at 10,000 kg per cubic km you get about 10 micrograms per cubic meter. The atomic weight of iron is 55g/mol. Multiply by Avogadro's number (6.02 x 1023 atoms/mol) and you get 100,000,000,000,000,000 atoms per cubic meter.

That's a teeny weeny bit larger than 1 atom per AU.

51 posted on 10/28/2013 10:08:00 AM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Gideon7

Thanks Gideon7.


54 posted on 10/28/2013 4:05:32 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Gideon7
Well that's big iron. I knew that the sun is about 8 light min from earth so I could have easily calculated 1ly=65700AU a number much smaller than I would have guessed. And a half solar mass of 1030 kg is mind bogglingly large to me, much larger than I would have suspected. In my imagination I was applying the inverse square principle to an under esteemed mass over an over esteemed light year.

Notwithstanding that your formula for the volume of a sphere is off by a order of magnitude of the radius, my imagination stands metrically and mathematically corrected. Thank you sir!

I'm still curios about how all that fast moving matter could coalesce to form asteroids and planets. I'll read the article. I'll also read about the history of the solar mass estimation. That's really facinating.

59 posted on 10/29/2013 1:10:58 AM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson