Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Viennacon
Bachmann, Steve King, Broun, Dent, Gohmert may end up voting against this resolution due to a deeply held conviction never to vote for anything that doesn’t fully defund Obamacare.

Then why isn't the House avoiding a defund bill by submitting separate department-level funding bills in its place?

Instead of defunding Obamacare, just separately fund everything else. That way, they aren't violating their convictions.

I'm guessing that they're not doing this because the leadership is afraid that it's so simple to understand by the People, that it might work. If it might work, then they have to avoid it as much as possible.

-PJ

145 posted on 09/30/2013 5:15:54 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

I would definitely favor that strategy, but perhaps time is a concern here. They should have started earlier.


148 posted on 09/30/2013 5:16:54 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

Now I’m confused. This from Steve King’s page.

“Washington, DC – Congressman Steve King released the following statement after voting in favor of the House amendments to H.J. Res 59, the Continuing Appropriations Act of 2014, which included a repeal of the medical device tax as well as a one year delay in Obamacare. The bill provides necessary appropriations for all government operations with the exception of those...”


163 posted on 09/30/2013 5:27:56 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson