Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Viennacon

The problem here is we are letting the establishment Republican party define what a “viable” candidate is - so of course the answer will be the only “viable” candidates are establishment Republicans.

Here is where I am at - I am done voting for “viable” GOP candidates - that is what gave us McCain as Presidential candidate. If they are not a conservative and willing to fight for those values then I dont care if we lose the seat. Let the liberals run the country into the ground and then we can pick up the pieces from there. I would rather rip the band-aid off at this point than to keep slowly pulling it away and losing our souls in the process.


50 posted on 09/29/2013 4:49:41 PM PDT by Baum Threat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Baum Threat

When I say ‘viable’, I am looking at it from my standpoint, that is

A) What is their fundraising ability?
B) Do they have political savvy?

Warner is a very entrenched candidate. He’s more entrenched than Dick Turban in Illinois. Defeating him would be much tougher than knocking off say, Kay Hagan.

I want a strong conservative challenger, but our bench in Virginia overall seems weak.


55 posted on 09/29/2013 5:04:59 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson