Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
You can argue prudence and risk, but the fact is that the state requires it.

There is a time in the not too distant past where many states did not require it, but many people in those states still had it.
56 posted on 09/25/2013 7:23:43 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Eagle of Liberty
There is a time in the not too distant past where many states did not require it, but many people in those states still had it.

True. And you can bet that a far, far larger percentage of the people at that time didn't have auto insurance at all. Why? Because it was the high percentage of uninsured motorists that motivated insurance companies to push for the law requiring insurance in the first place. They were tires of paying for damage done to their clients by uninsured motorists.

58 posted on 09/25/2013 7:28:25 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson