1 posted on
09/15/2013 6:27:16 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
To: SunkenCiv
Study suggests anatomically modern humans may have been in eastern Asia as much as 100,000 years ago."Study suggests..." Love that line.
News flash: "anatomically modern humans" describes almost any upright primate. They did proliferate the planet until...ta-da, one of them said: "Pass the potatoes, fool, before you eat them all."
To: All
There is no such thing as "human evolution". For any hominid to have evolved into a human, that hominid would have needed to:
- Lose his fur coat while ice ages were going on.
- Lose almost all of his sense of smell while trying to make it as a land prey animal (fatal by itself).
- Lose almost all of its night vision in an age when night was the only time of day to be had.
You say that doesn't sound like a formula for success?? Humans and hominids don't even come from the same place.
The only relationship which exists between humans and hominids is the same relationship which exists between Fords and Toyotas, i.e. similar design.
To: SunkenCiv
Did the ancients know they were ancients? Or did they think of themselves as currents? So much to ponder and so little time.
8 posted on
09/15/2013 7:50:24 AM PDT by
Conspiracy Guy
(To stay calm during these tumultuous times, I take Damitol. Ask your Doctor if it's right for you.)
To: SunkenCiv
"This includes the advent of H. erectus at more than 400 ka old, rather than the current 230 ka; archaic H. sapiens at more than 200 ka, instead of ca. 110 ka; and the emergence of AMH at around 100 ka or earlier."Calico: A 200,000-year Old Site In The Americas?
23 posted on
09/15/2013 11:39:09 AM PDT by
blam
To: SunkenCiv
Scientists have now discovered a continuous line of fossilized Chinese takeout containers from the former "gap" era.

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson