[editor-surveyor]

You continue with your strawman arguments.

Nothing you attribut to me originates with my posts.

You cannot debat the fact6s that I state so you go to the progressive quisling candy store for somethying more to your liking.

I did not say that There is no distinction between Justice Scalia and Ruth Ginsberg. The distinction is not relevent to this question anyway. I said nothing about Madison, as you know, but you have shown that honesty is far too much to expect from you.

The only magnificent thing about our founding ultimately is that the nation was founded on Yeshua’s gospel, but even that didn’t last when your kind got the vote.

The hatred is obviously yours since you advocate turning the constitution into Charmin.

[sometime lurker]

Sorry, your post is garbage. you claimed "evil" and that those I cited were "excrement". You never rebutted a single court case I presented. You refused to answer whether Madison (who said similar things to some of the quotes from court cases) was lumped in with those you considered evil. I presented facts, you present insults.

The only magnificent thing about our founding ultimately is that the nation was founded on Yeshua’s gospel, but even that didn’t last when your kind got the vote. The hatred is obviously yours since you advocate turning the constitution into Charmin.

Unlike you, I think the founding of America is magnificent, and the Constitution, while imperfect as are all works of men, is an outstanding achievement. You are the one who wants "to turn the Constitution into Charmin" by claiming it says things that it in fact does not say.