Replies

The crux of the issue — the requirement for the President to be a natural-born citizen — is that he (or she) have no allegiance to any other country. Neither parent being at the time of birth a citizen of another country, not born in another country, not self-identifying as a foreign student to slip into an ivy-league school, and also not accepting any honorary or dual citizenship of another country.

As much as I appreciate and respect Ted Cruz, I do not believe he meets the requirement. However, I will vote for him if the alternative is any Democrat.... for the good of the country.

Since I agree with that latter sentiment, I have to have a slightly different view of the bolded part of the first one.
The Framers’ desire was that only people (men, at the time) whose allegiance was to the Constititution and the people of the United States should ever be president. The Natural Born Citizen requirement is merely the best proxy they could come up with for that. Thus, if Obama, with his contempt for people who wouldn’t look like his imaginary son and his arbitrary refusal to “see that the law be faithfully enforced," meets the “Natural Born Citizen” requirement, that is a mere technicality. And if a Ted Cruze, with his patent devotion to the Constitution, does not meet the NBC criterion, that is also a technicality. Which can be brushed aside as easily as Obama brushes aside the provisions of his own signature law. Or as easily as someone moves his voting registration from Texas back to his native state of Wyoming in order to qualify to run as VP on the same ticket as the governor of Texas.
But in a nation of 300 million people there really ought to be someone who meets the strictest NBC test and can be relied on to be sincere when pledging to defend the Constitution. And of course there is - Clarence Thomas. But we can’t spare the man, where he is. But Sarah Palin passes with flying colors . . .

The Framers’ desire was that only people (men, at the time) whose allegiance was to the Constititution and the people of the United States should ever be president. The Natural Born Citizen requirement is merely the best proxy they could come up with for that. Thus, if Obama, with his contempt for people who wouldn’t look like his imaginary son and his arbitrary refusal to “see that the law be faithfully enforced," meets the “Natural Born Citizen” requirement, that is a mere technicality. And if a Ted Cruze, with his patent devotion to the Constitution, does not meet the NBC criterion, that is also a technicality. Which can be brushed aside as easily as Obama brushes aside the provisions of his own signature law.

And this is exactly my position. I wish to add that I want the technicality strictly enforced in the case of Obama, and I want it ignored in the case of Cruz.

Obama is foreign in Spirit, and the intent of the SPIRIT of the law was to keep out such foreign spirits as Obama.

Ted Cruz does not violate the spirit of the law.