You seem to have some trouble understanding my posts, as well as understanding Common Law. You have decided noted jurists from Justice Scalia to those early in our history are "evil" without giving any reason why. It would seem you think anyone who has a different interpretation of NBC is "evil" in your mind and not a patriot. Do you include James Madison in that?
Step back, look at the evidence of what the Founders, Framers, and early jurists and legal historians meant by NBC. If you choose not to think, not to understand what our early history says, who is the better patriot?
While debate is fine if you actually have points to make or information to bring; if all you can do is spew insults, don't bother posting.
.
False.
I clearly stated the reason why. They wish to subject men to the tyranny of government control of their lives.
Scalia is no better than Boehner or McConnell, or Rubio.
These men think that they are our betters, but they are our excrement.
The evidence that you ignore is the strong evidence.
Your standard supports false aliegiance.
Now go play with your Global Progressive pals; we have no time for your kind.