Cruz is the farthest from the lesser of two evils since Reagan.
You have been given good and sound reasons to show you are likely wrong in your opinion of eligibility. You may want to rethink your position, it's hardly clear, and the reason I call it "niggling" is not because it's unimportant, rather it's the manner you have come to your conclusion.
As to name calling, I used niggling and Pharisee, hardly the stuff of high Alinskyism. I've seen far worse from your side.
The reason I come to these threads is Cruz is NOT a shoe in. It will be a fight to get him nominated and then elected, and who knows if he will really run. The WAPOST put up 12 articles on the birther issue in two days, clearly the libs are setting this issue up, I wish that your side wasn't cooperating with the left quite so readily.
I want his kind of politician to succeed, I want to encourage him and I'd love him to run and win.
“Cruz is the farthest from the lesser of two evils since Reagan.”
The lesser of two evils still equals a lesser of two evils. It doesn’t make it better if it’s a lesser of a lesser of two evils.
You, too, have been given good and sound reasons to show you are likely wrong in your opinion of eligibility. You may want to rethink your position.
“Niggling” and “Pharisee” are not what I’m talking about. What I’m talking about is the pejorative “birther” or, in your words, “idiot birther”. Then there is “liar”, “moron”, etc. etc. from your FRiends.
What I really want to know is why your side is so strongly pushing someone whose eligibility is so questionable. I wish your side wasn’t cooperating with the left quite so readily.
I want this type of politcian to succeed, also. Finding a reasonably honest, literate, articulate spokesman for conservativism is our wildest dream. But I must insist that whomever we pick and spend our hard earned money to support is eligible for the office.