[arthurus]

Among the North American Plains Indians, homosexuals who became adults tended to be the shamans. They did not, however, rule.
I am skeptical of the conclusions presented. Females in our own society have become the actual elite, at least educationally, but they do not rule. They may become a majority in the Congress, and that looks to be in the cards, but they will not rule. It is not in the genes.

[madmominct]

SAY WHAT???

[jtal]

Yes I agree. This is wishful thinking on the part of feminized academics.

Sadly, in this day and age my default position is to disbelieve aby report of a new academic finding - that’s how corrupted our educational system has become.

[txrangerette]

Golda Meir of Israel and Margaret Thatcher of Great Britain proved to be exceptions. There have been others throughout the world, not as famous, and not leaders of powerful countries, that have ruled and are ruling in their own spheres. It would be easy to research their names and countries.

[chesty_puller]

but they will not rule

Not much of a Margaret Thatcher fan are ya.

[Tax-chick]

I am skeptical of the conclusions presented.

I agree. The archaeological finds are extremely interesting, but the conclusions reached from the discoveries are quite a jump ... and almost all conclusions of this kind are, in the absence of text.