JoePa admitted he knew something was going on with Sandusky, knew it had been reported to the University admin and police, yet did nothing to follow up. The “in hindsight” reference is strong evidence he knew. If he didn’t, why would he not simply say he didn’t know what Sandusky had done.
Sandusky was eventually banned from the facilities and JoePa didn’t know what had happened? Are you really that naive?
You don’t know what you’re talking about. If you’d read what I post, and the links I pos, you would be more educated. You choose not to and you choose to stick with what the media has told you. I can’t help you.
Your post shows that you have followed the mainstream media narritive. However that narrative is not what actually happened.
Yeh -- he found out in 2012 what went on in 2001. That's called "hindsight".
Sandusky was eventually banned from the facilities and JoePa didn’t know what had happened?
First of all Sandusky was not banned from the facilities. He was forbidden from bringing any of his TSM kids into the facilities with him anymore.
But think about what you just said: Joe didn't see Sandusky bringing his kids into the facilities anymore. If you are Paterno, what would you conclude from that??? Would you not conclude from that that the higher-ups had addressed the Sandusky matter and dealt with him and handed out sanctions???
So where is the conspiracy to cover up???