Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 60Gunner
MacArthur should have been relieved of his command and court-martialed for his negligence.

Only if you believe the left's version of history.

56 posted on 08/04/2013 12:20:44 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: fso301

At the outset of the War, MacArthur was the supreme Commander in the Philippines, not the US Army. He was immediately recalled. But the point is the he was caught off guard as well.

There are very few innocent parties in this part of the war.


64 posted on 08/04/2013 12:34:37 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Does anybody really know what time it is? Does anybody really care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: fso301

McArthur made a big error in the Philippines, and it hasn’t got anything to do with B-17’s or the air force. On the other hand its hard to see what he could have done differently. His big contribution was to convince both the Americans and the Filipinos that the Philippine Army (a conscripted citizen army at the time) could be made effective with the pathetic budgets, few cadre and derisory training time available. I suspect this was based on his rather limited experience with leading a US National Guard Division in WWI. The “Rainbow” division was combat effective and had high morale, even when it was inexperienced. This confidence in such troops was not warranted when it came to the Philippine army. The first major action at Lingayen made it painfully clear that the Philippine Army was nearly useless in maneuver battle and probably would remain so without months more of training and combat experience. That put an end to any idea of protracted resistance.


93 posted on 08/04/2013 2:07:54 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson