Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
No, doubt, MacArthur has a good case for being the worst general in U.S. history.

No doubt MacArthur experienced some spectacular debacles, such as his failure to prepare for the Japanese air raid on the Philippines on December 8, 1941, several hours after Pearl Harbor was bombed, but his "Island hopping" strategy was brilliant, as was his landing at Inchon in 1950.

And I can think of some far worse generals, such as Horatio Gates, who was routed at Camden in 1780, or William H. Winder, who lost the Battle of Bladensburg in 1814, after which the British occupied Washington, DC.

60 posted on 07/10/2013 6:25:18 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Fiji Hill
MacArthur was only allowed to get in the way/botch 2 wars because he was so popular. But he was allowed to do his own thing in the Pacific, even if he didn't coordinate with Admiral Nimitz, and even if it was a blunder. How about losing a whole division in Korea, and it would have been more if the Marines hadn't basically been insubordinate to him.

MacArthur was insubordinate to 3 president. Now that might sound cool, but in his case, it really was't.

62 posted on 07/10/2013 6:39:07 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson