not allowing the text message evidence is in fact a violation of GZ’s due process. Again, the evidence goes to the theory of his defense and the prosecution can attack the weight of that evidence on cross. That is the law.
Thanks for that clarification.
To a non legal person what she did just didn’t make common sense.
The prosecution is able to paint the picture anyway they want, and the defense has to battle the “ saint image” in spite of potential proof to the contrary.
“Again, the evidence goes to the theory of his defense and the prosecution can attack the weight of that evidence on cross. That is the law.”
Just like this:
“Not to go on all-fours; that is the Law. Are we not Men?”