[knarf]

This guy is putting into plain text what we all talk about here.

How many opinions have we read here when someone says something like;

"Well, the lump on the side of Z's head had no abrasion but the back did, therefore it must have been a fist on the side and concrete on the back"

We all talk what we think logic based on our own real life experiences and court testimony is all too often ... just say yes or no.

I like this guy.

[RoosterRedux]

In some ways this witness is delivering an early version of MOM's summation in that he is helping the jury form an opinion based on the substantive evidence given and ignoring the emotional and trivial questions raised by the State.

MOM and West have been absolutely brilliant in their use of witnesses.